Sign up for our newsletter! 
Click here.

Our investors, the VOSMIs describe their stories and how their Fortress RDI syndicated mortgage investment has impacted their lives. VOSMI Stories These are true stories shared by Victims of Syndicated Mortgage Investors. We Hope these stories give others the courage to come forward. If you want to share your experience as a Fortress investor, please complete this form . Please note that your story will be viewed by the public. Hard Pill to Swallow We innocently share life stories with our colleagues not knowing they are actually scouting you for commission they get for introducing you to brokers. I was almost at the tail end of my career, and after losing money in mutual funds, getting fixed interest for investments seemed like a good option. We were told the investments were safe and Fortress will never let their investors down. That they will pay back the money even if they incur loss. I happily retired in 2016, with money invested in syndicated mortgages. Life seemed normal until the RCMP raid happened and it was published in the papers. BDMC no longer existed. FAAN took over the projects. Interest payments stopped. Olympia Trust continued to deduct charges. Life got disrupted. I had a lot of faith in our government & regulatory bodies as we have strict rules in the banking and financial industry. To use an analogy, when we visit a community pool, it has all the equipment & people for rescue, ie floats, whistle, bands, lifeguard, etc. We have no fear of our kids drowning as they are in good hands. We carry the same comfort when it comes to the Canadian regulatory bodies. We believe they will protect us from fraudsters & not let them sell fraudulent products to retail investors. They should know the players well and have the industry knowledge. It was a hard pill to swallow when I realized my money invested was gone. All the locations are amazing. Properties are close to free-ways and upcoming communities. When the rest of the country is having a real estate boom, we are having challenges selling condo units. (This is so hard to believe.) It was very depressing and shameful that someone can do this to you by gaining your trust. I’m hoping we find some justice and get compensated for the loss. ~Anonymous Investor Money Meant for our Future and Now it is All Gone My wife and I were approached by our financial advisor about investing in a syndicated mortgage. He had been to a few Fortress presentations and thought that this would be a secure short term investment for us even though he knew we were not high risk investors. Our advisor made arrangements for FDS broker to come to our hometown and make a presentation at a local restaurant for a number of investors to attend. Both the broker and our advisor repeated over and over how secure our money would be as it was guaranteed against the property and that our name would be on the deed. During the ILA the lawyer said the same thing. We have 4 children and we helped all of them pay for university (a total of 25 yrs of post secondary education between the 4 of them.) Just prior to me retiring we invested both of our TFSA's $100,000.00-- money that was meant for our future and now it is all gone. There is no way at this stage of our lives that we can ever hope to make it up. This has devastated us financially and emotionally. We feel that we have been robbed of our retirement plans after a lifetime of hard work and trying to do things the right way. My wife will not be able to retire and I will be returning to work. ~ M & S $96,000 investment in Crates Landing We invested in Crates Landing, Old Market Lane, and Wellington house. We have invested $96.000.00 in total. Today we came to know the agent who signed us into these projects has given up his license. He is not answering any calls. It’s my husband’s RRSP investment. We were told 8 percent for a period of 2 years. We invested in 2016 with an added extension of one year. Now it’s past the time frame and we don’t see any release of funds. We didn’t know until now that Olympia was not taking care of the investment. Is there any hope Everything is at a standstill. -Investor What Happens When you Trust Your Financial Advisor? What happens when you put your trust in your financial adviser? Well like me, you sit and listen to her tell you how they will make your money grow. You listen to her tell you how safe it is. She tells you, you have nothing to worry about because you are second in line to get your money back if anything goes wrong. She tells you it's safe; that is why you are allowed to invest your pension money. She tells you that you have a lawyer for free. But then the interest payments stop. You question should we do something. She tells you not to worry; your money is safe. Every few months you question her and she tells you the same thing every time. Your money is safe. After you get a letter saying it is going to be sold, you call up your advisor and she tells you that you are not second in line but you are further down the line and it doesn't look good and you might not get your money back. Well that is what happens when you trust an advisor. That is what happened to me. That's what happens when your advisor makes money selling fraud. ~ Mike L Unable to Retire & Had to Sell our Home I met my mortgage broker through a former boss. I was intrigued by his proposal but I was just turning 65 and hoping to retire within 6 months. I did what I thought was sufficient research into the project (Collier Place) and my broker assured me I would have my money back in 2 years. He told me that I would need $100,000 to invest so I used $62,000 RRSP money and borrowed $38,000 from the bank. For the next 14 months the interest was appearing in my registered account at Olympic Trust. Then the builder declared bankruptcy and everything began to unravel. The interest payments stopped but my broker continued to reassure me that once Fortress took over everything would be back on track. Meanwhile, I had to leave my office management job in Mississauga and take a minimum wage retail job closer to home as my husband had had a couple of strokes and was diagnosed with dementia. As the months went on I realized I couldn’t do all the upkeep on my own that a house requires plus it was becoming too expensive. So I had to sell the house that my husband had built and lived in for 54 years and we moved to a smaller community that was more cost effective. I am now 72 and still working at a minimum wage job and expect I will be working for another couple of years. ~Bonnie E. This Smells like a Ponzi Scheme We are 77 years old. Our financial advisor of 25 years, introduced us to this new type of government approved investment in the condo market. He explained everything about Fortress and the insurance we have with a mortgage on the property. I questioned how they made money on this and why they needed our money at that interest rate. He said the sale of the building to foreign investors for 50 to 100 million profit covers the costs. We first bought 3 with Brad Lamb. These paid out in full so we bought 3 more; Jasper $30,000; 6th & 10th $30,000; and Sky City $25,500 TFSA. Now Brad Lamb is stalling on overdue accounts; Jasper, 6th & 10th, and Sky City. The photo of Fortress Group in the centre of the property and the statement tells all. Quote; "We have to rethink this project, it isn't going to work." It took 7-10 years to figure that out. Nothing was spent on the property and probably just readings for drawings. They sold the property to Li who is now the secured creditor--how do you sell a piece of property without discharging any mortgages on it? The investors would have to pay Li out before they get paid. Something is wrong with this picture. We are anxious to learn what the RCMP discover in their investigation and hope they are brought to justice. Brad Lamb and Fortress have multi-millions of our money and this smells like a Ponzi scheme. This is my own fault; I trusted someone else with my money; he knew what he was doing. Fortress paid him more than he ever made before to round us up like chickens to slaughter. Losing this money will be devastating. It was our retirement savings to look after us in our final years. Our government does NOT have this Ponzi scheme problem solved. Fortress employees and Brad Lamb have many millions of our money. There is hanky panky going on with the Sky City property….someone should spend their final days looking out windows with bars. ~Fred & Betty W. First Time Investor I would like to share my experience of being a first time investor. I met my broker through my friends. They did some insurances and investments with him and recommended him as a reliable person. He was advertising 8% safe interest for your investments in the Russian magazines and online, attracting potential investors. When we met he explained in detail this type of investment and presented Fortress as one of the best companies in this market. In order to make my decision I asked a lot of questions including the risks, the warranties not to lose my principal (I agreed to risk not to get the interest.) I asked if it could be any kind of fraud, Ponzi scheme, and could it happen that I get the interest from my own money, etc. I was assured that it was super safe and nothing happens to my money since my name was secured on the land and the cost of the land is growing. He showed me the appraisal of the land, telling me to imagine how high this number will be after the project is completed. He said many times it wasn’t Russia--it was Canada and everything is by the law here. Everything seemed logical. Every offer was a rush--you have to decide faster because someone will invest before me. I asked who was the lawyer who was reading my agreement on the broker’s phone, does he represent me or the borrower? I was told that, of course, he represented me and my interests but the borrower pays for everything. After the first investment I started to get the updates and the interest. He offered more projects. In January 2017 I stopped receiving the interests for all 4 projects at the same time. The maturity dates passed, the extensions according to the agreement have passed too. I asked for my principal back since I fulfilled all the requirements but I was told to wait because it wasn’t possible to get the money from the project. I said that it looks very strange that all my projects stopped at the same time and again I was reassured that it was just a coincidence with my particular projects. In 2017 I was contacted by a journalist regarding SkyCity. I informed the broker but he said that the journalists just spoiled everything and don’t know anything and that everything was great with the project. I started my own research and found out that the project and SM was in trouble! All documents said if you have any questions to contact your broker but he was hiding the real situation knowing that nothing could be done. From the beginning he hid the information that Fortress keeps 35% of the investor’s money and that the interest was paid from my own money. Since summer he wasn’t answering the phone so in September I found him working in one brokerage in Toronto. He knew very well that I couldn’t risk the principal, he knew that I signed because I was promised to receive a regular interest--it wasn’t RRSP savings, he knew that I agreed because it was a short term investments with NO risks. The effect of this fraud caused a terrible financial loss to my family. ~KD Preyed on the Weak & Innocent I invested my entire retirement savings (RRSP) into this Fortress scam. I worked hard for that money, and nothing was ever given to me. I had a financial advisor for approximately 15 years, so he had my trust. I was told to invest in this ‘high interest syndicated mortgage’ for just 2 years, it was a quick turnaround, high payout and then move my money into something else. I was also told that it was ‘guaranteed’, as I was on title. Never did I think that this ‘advice’ was motivated by greed and high commissions. Those commissions were never disclosed to me. Neither was the fact that the project already had significant liens on it. My advisor didn’t do a risk assessment on me and any assessments that were done in the past, I was always came out as medium risk. I was never in the high risk category. I was given ‘ILA’ by a lawyer on the phone (who I now know was working for Fortress). It was a well planned methodical scam, from beginning to end. My advisor and his accomplices were clearly trained by Fortress for this sales pitch. I was taken for a fool. They preyed on the weak and innocent. It breaks my heart knowing now the others who have been roped into this scam were relying on this money to take care of themselves and loved ones who are too ill and have nothing else. Some invested everything they had and have nothing left. Some single mothers with young children have to work multiple jobs to make ends meet. These predators don’t understand the damage they have done. They don’t understand the pain and suffering we have endured as a result of this scam. I pray for justice for all the victims. God bless us all. ~Danny Rap I Will Fight for My Family My father was introduced to Frank Dragonetti through a mutual friend. He was asked time after time to invest, attend free dinners, and seminars. At this time I was 19 years old, just started my first year of University. My mother had a savings account, that she put in my name, transferred the funds to me, so that I would be able to pay for school. At this I got a job and I was making enough money to pay for my own school. So from that point, my father suggested that we take half of the funds and invest it. What good is it sitting in the bank, right? We can make an 8% return, right? Guaranteed, right? The building is already up, right? BMO has occupied the building, that means its legit, right? Real estate is the safest place to invest, right? Right. Mr. Dragonetti, came into my home, sat at my kitchen table, saw this 19 year old kid, and allowed me sign $30,000.00 away. That day, I invested in the Collier Barrie Project. A couple months after, my father decided to invest. He invested his whole retirement/life savings. He invested $100,000.00 in the South Shore Project, and $110,000.00 in the Collier Barrie Project. We since then have gotten letter after letter, regarding an extension to the contract that we signed (which was only for 1 year), promising an additional 8%. That was four years ago. Since then, my mother has fallen depressed, working over 60 hours a week on her feet just to TRY a make back what we've lost. My father is having a hard time letting go of his pride since he is now unable to provide for our family, and unable to plan for his future. For someone who was so close to retirement, so ready to enjoy what is left of life...this was not the way life should be for him, or for us. They argued over this frequently. The choice to invest with Fortress was putting a damper on their 25 year+ relationship. As time passed, it was getting harder and harder to pay our own mortgage, yet we gave our hard earned money to pay someone else's comfortable life. My mother got into a car accident, now unable to put in 1 hour of work, let alone the 60 she used to do. Most recently, and I personally believe its as a result of stress, my father got diagnosed with cancer. Which in result leaves him unable to work. And so here I am. Left with tying to give my parents a second chance at life, trying to give them the opportunity to bounce back and enjoy what's left of life. All while I'm trying to set myself up for a percentage of success at this thing called life. As its been nothing but hell. I have postponed my wedding, I have postponed buying my own house as i cannot afford paying two mortgages. I have to get a second job, one because I need more money and two because i keep taking days off to support my father and doctor appointments. So if your thoughts are, "are you going to sue?". Yes. With every last breath, with every last penny I got. They all have to suffer. My family's investment ensures their families have roofs over their heads, food in their bellies, and clothes on their backs. They were ruthless enough to do this treacherous act to innocent, middle class people, then I will be a savage as well, and disregard everything they care for evenly. I will fight. ~V. This Was Not What Life was Supposed to Be I invested with Fortress in 2014 in a project called Mississauga, to later be renamed Anchors 2. I invested $98,000.00 and I received interest payments for 2 years. This was to be a small and short project, done in 2 years with a possible extension for one more year. It is now 2019, and the project is only a leveled site. Dunsire the developer pulled out because they claimed no money in the project. The site is under power of sale with 5 or 6 million owed on mortgages. I spent around 3 months looking at this and had several meetings with the broker Bob Bindher (who left Fortress and I can find no information about him.) I was told the following by the broker; they only dealt with proven contractors, they never get involved until the project has all approvals done, the shovel is ready to go in ground, and if I wanted to be involved in this project I had to act quickly as they had almost reached the money needed for this project. I was told that there was risk but there’s risk in all investments, and that they only released money for the project as the value of the project increased--that way the project was always worth more than owed against. This is written into my contract. I was told that 100% of my money went to the project, that all fees were paid by the developer and that the broker’s fee was 4% paid for by developer, that they never missed an interest payment and that they never had a project fail, that they were replanning building to make it more profitable and by stopping interest payments it would in the end quicken the building process and we would all make more money. I asked for my money back as I felt they broke the contract, and they responded with a no, and said all delays were covered in the contract and if I didn’t like it, to hire a lawyer. The money I invested was part of a buyout I received from my employer and the interest was to offset my small pension. I am now 69 and must continue to work a minimum wage job to make ends meet and do not see a point where I can stop working. I am mentally and physically worn out. The principal was to be used for my granddaughter’s education and this sickens me the most that it will not be there for her. I have not had a holiday for years now and nothing in sight. The small things in life are not available for me; a couple beers, round of golf, etc. At the end of each month I hope to find enough for an outing with my little buddy who is now 5. I do not share with my daughter and son as this is my problem not theirs. I’m better off than others; I do not go hungry or get cold but this was not what life was supposed to be!!! ~R Bean $100,000 Invested from our Home Equity I first heard about Fortress from my financial advisor and a few friends; he introduced me to a mortgage agent under FMP. We did leveraging (borrowing) to invest in Fortress. We took $100,000 from our home equity. He said it was safe and our names are on the land title, and we can never go wrong with real estate investment. We put in $82,000.00 in George project, visited the site and we decided, yes, Georgetown is booming, and the exit is only two years. Sutton Drive in Burlington is a good location, so we put in $30,000.00. Things went well with interest payments coming in but when it stopped coming, I was gut wrenched. Now we have to put in our own money for the loan that we got from the bank. I was hoping that it will be back to normal, and phoned this mortgage agent. He said everything is fine, nothing is fishy. They will build a temple in Georgetown everything will be just be fine. Sutton in Burlington is going to take a little bit longer. We did thorough homework on this Burlington project, and consulted our own lawyer. The next thing I know I’m reading an article in The Globe and Mail about Fortress being raided by the RCMP! More negative news in the newspaper about Fortress and the last one was when FAAN dropped the bomb on us that we. the secondary lender won’t have any money left after the Only bidder took over the Georgetown project for $7.4 Million and after all the fees are paid, nothing is left for us secondary lenders. I cried and cried for days but my husband was very consoling saying it’s just money and what is important is health. Sleepless nights had been dominating my whole being, asking questions to myself such as what if’s, why, and blaming ourselves for being greedy of the 8% interest, we are such good people why this is happening to us! I am a prayerful person but this time my prayers had escalated tremendously. This is what keeps me going and my sanity intact. I can’t tell my family members, I am so embarrassed to open up because they might say we’re stupid. My first thought was I hope we can form a group of investors that were victimized by Fortress, so here I am, one of the 28 investors that gathered thru the pioneering effort of Eric Mendoza, courtesy of Mr. Rebelo for allowing us to use the facilities of Oasis convention centre. I also informed my friend, because I know they have invested with Fortress as well. Up to this date, my prayers are unceasing, keeping me and my husband strong emotionally. Losing $82,000.00 this way is very devastating. Having sleepless nights is an ongoing thing for me. My principle is I will not stop fighting for this cause, whatever it takes. I thank this group. They blessings. God will guide us through this journey. ~Zeny U In Limbo- Fortress Should be Held Accountable I currently have an investment with Fortress (administered by Sorrenti) and am in limbo. I’m not sure what is happening with it and the outcome. From what I read, they have overextended all the financing on many projects which leaves no payout at the end. The worst thing is that I referred my sister and some friends. Some friends invested on numerous projects. ( 150-200K +). I feel extremely bad and responsible. Fortress should be held accountable and all the parties involved with this should be held personally responsible with assets seized as they had this attention of scamming people and taking a joyride on other people's money. Seize all their personal accounts and assets! Single Mom & No More Savings for My Sons I first heard about Fortress syndicated mortgage investments through my mortgage broker, who introduced it to me as a way to make "passive income" while going through a devastating divorce. He knew I was in a vulnerable position and that this was all of my retirement and life savings, all of it. I invested $195,000.00. He also knew I was a single mother of two teenagers, and that I was not risk-neutral; that I wanted and needed a more secure style investment with less risk. He assured me that this was a safe investment and that his company had a history and track record of safe investments with no losses incurred by investors, something that he said was unique and rare in the industry. The impact of the losses on my family has been that I no longer have savings or college funds available for both my sons who are now about to enter college age, and I have to work three jobs to pay for our bills and expenses. It has been irrevocably devastating. My mental health has been severely impacted, and my kids worry for me and my ability to keep it together under the extreme stress of making ends meet. It seems Fortress has turned out to be a fraudulent Ponzi scheme that lured investors by paying us interest from our own principal! (not even from the project!) and also paying interest to earlier investors with funds from more recent investors, leading us to falsely believe that profits were coming from projects, when in fact it was just coming from other investor victims and our own principal. It’s a national crime, and shame on FSCO for betraying the retail consumers they are supposed to be protecting. -Islena F. All the Money I had for Retirement I was introduced to this investment by a "friend" who knew my situation, that I had inherited money from my aunt and needed it to give me a certain amount of spending money and to keep my principal safe as I was 66 years old, and that was all the money I had for retirement. I was assured this investment was totally safe, Fortress had never missed an interest payment and had always exited in a timely fashion. I was told that they could extend the exit once for 6 months. I was never informed that 35% of my money would be taken out of my investment or that my so-called interest payments was coming from my investment. I was assured again and again by my agent that this was a safe investment - even in 2018. I did receive my interest for approx 1-1/2 years then 3 or 4 weeks after investing in Alberta, interest payments for all projects stopped immediately. I was left without any income, aside from a small CPP. My partner ended up paying all the bills for the last 4 years (I was supposed to pay 1/2) and we will possibly lose our condo. I was advised by my agent that it made more sense not to pay for condo outright, as the interest on our condo was only 2-1/2% whereas I was getting 8% interest, so was making money. This year my partner has discovered he has cancer and because of this situation has had to keep working through his chemo treatments. As well, my agent continually made remarks against my partner as he refused to invest in this and our relationship has deteriorated because I did. Up until Christmas of 2017 the agent who I kept in touch with looking for some assurance kept insisting that everything was find when he had to have known how bad things really were. We are taking 5 projects with $345,000 that I have invested. -Margaret Pins & Needles I am a recently divorced lady who escaped a bad marriage after my former husband foolishly gambled away my inheritance. With my limited remaining resources namely my TFSA I needed up investing in one Fortress project. I heard of this Syndicated Mortgage investment listening to AM 640 in my way home from work. The speaker (aka advertiser) was a real estate agent, I felt was trustworthy named Lou Berkowitz and he spelled out the high returns and safety of this investment. . I signed up for a presentation and was sold on investing, and did not heed the warnings on the lack of liquidity or possible risks which were downplayed as rare. FDS promoted all the successful exits that gave clients their interest and I put my 40k TFSA in a Brad Lamb project called The James. My original intent was to only risk 20k but the FDS team offered me a rebate of half the Olympia Trust Fees if I increased my investment. So here I am, turns out Brad Lamb is trying to buy us out at a discount with no interest even though the James has been rebranded the Woodsworth and is selling for far more psf that originally. Awaiting if FAAN will take it. I am totally frustrated and on pins and needles. I don’t believe for a second this project will lose Brad Lamb a dime, he is just leveraging the negative publicity and fear to scare us to settle for a fraction of our investment. Barbara Lack of Oversight We invested in Fortress both with RRSP (as we learn now it is not eligible) and a line of credit, totaling $135,000. Now, after 8 years these funds need to be repaid, with interest to the bank who gave us the Line Of Credit. Not only was the 'guaranteed 8%' not guaranteed at all, we are also faced with Olympia's threats to collect on an account that we were forced into transferring into. Yet there is no one responsible. Everyone took their money and left. And because this issue is too complicated, there is was no interest in the government to undo its lack of oversight. It was easier to turn a blind eye even though these parties, and several individuals were known to the government. Kathy S Money Invested Was for my Retirement - I Have my House for Sale I invested in 4 projects for a total of $185,000 thinking these were safe investments. When filling out my investment profile I indicated I was a low to moderate risk investor however my agent changed it to high risk investor but assured me these were secure projects. The money invested was for my retirement and I was looking for a higher rate of interest other than the bank could provide. I now have my house up for sale because I can no longer afford to maintain it, plus having trouble selling in this tough market. I am in a very difficult position and getting sick thinking about how I was robbed out of my hard earned money. Mary D East Coast Investment goes South In June 2014, I met Glenn May Anderson, the president of FDS Broker Services, when I applied for a job as an agent in Nova Scotia. Fortress was looking to enter the East Coast Market and becoming an agent was easier than in other provinces (You do not have to pass a test, only pay the fee). After getting hired on, he asked me if I had any money I wanted to invest. I said that I had over $50,000 in my current pension in a Brad Lamb Development in Edmonton called North. At this point Mr Anderson began to laud how secure my investment would be. He explained that a syndicate mortgage was a mortgage and was therefore fully protected. He said that Fortress was always going to be second in title. No investor had ever walked away without their original investment plus their promised interest. This was echoed to me by Tasha Sutherland, the person who I was to be trained by. Furthermore, Mr Anderson told me that although Fortress was second in title, "no self-respecting judge ANYWHERE" would allow a property to be sold Power of Sale without the original investors being properly compensated. Mr Anderson and Miss Sutherland echoed this to potential investors at individual and group meetings I organized for them in Halifax. It was at this point I invested my $50,000 as I really thought they were telling the truth (please note that I made no sales to any investors as the group literally ghosted me) After a while, I began to notice that I was not getting any interest payments I was promised. I contacted FDS and Fortress but no one called me back. I would send emails and leave phone messages. Nothing. I then called and gave a false name, saying I had money that I wanted to invest. I got a call back that day on the number I gave. I was told by Miss Sutherland that they would transfer my investment into another property. I was happy with this as I thought I may get something back. However, I was then told this would not be happening. I received nothing. When I asked for at least some sort of update, I was met with terse emails, some being three to four words. Eventually Miss Sutherland's email address was not working as she left the company. Mr Anderson had his license revoked. And I have nothing. GM Promises, Promises I heard about Fortress by the broker, Baytree Real Capital whose name is Ted Jin. I and my wife invested $40,500 EACH by TFSA in Collier Center Project on Dec 21st, 2015. At the time, Ted Jin in Bay Tree promised 8% interest per year and principal will be returned in one or two years, but I got only one time of 8% interest prepaid. We lost a total of $81000 of principal that is for our retirement. During the time Olympia Trust charged account fee for monthly and yearly. They were also my loss. dws I Don't Expect to Ever See a Dime I live in Halifax was approached by my insurance agent, who was also a friend, to meet his friend and be introduced to an investment opportunity with a "guaranteed" 8% return. Like so many I fell for the "guarantee" and invested $130,000 in RRSP funds in two different Fortress mortgages. For two years all went well and then the payments stopped and the excuses started. After reading the legal documents, which of course no one gives you the time to do on the day of signing, I realized that basically I was up the proverbial creek knowing that my 2nd mortgage could easily be moved to a 3rd, 4th or 5th, meaning the chance of seeing my principal back was basically nil. I was/am angry at my "friend" for introducing me to his friend who sold me on these investments. Truth be told I don't expect to ever see a dime as the little people never do unfortunately. What makes matters worse is that I also invested an additional $300,000,000 in other "guaranteed" investments with the same person who introduced me to Fortress and you can guess what has happened to most of that money....regular payments ceased and the stories began. Fortress is just the tip of the iceberg with the investments scams that exist in this country and I'm experiencing the 90% or underbelly of the iceberg you never see. I struggle with being so naive to have trusted someone I barely knew and have become less trusting of others as a result. Those involved in this major league scam will one day pay the price, be in this life or the next. CY Not Getting the Money They Owe Me I invested $45,ooo.oo with Fortress Real Capital .,signed April 23/2012. The project was for Port Place luxury waterfront in St Catherines, guaranteeing me 8% interest on my money. The project did not go through, so now I am not getting the money they owe me. LB Baytree Capital- "Low Risk, 8% Guaranteed Return" I heard this Fortress investment through the investment broker Taehoon Jin works at Baytree Capital. He did a presentation about this investment and said it has low risk with 8% guaranteed return in a year or two. It seems attractive so my wife and I invested $81,000 in total from our TFSA. This is a part of my retirement fund, and it impacts my current retirement financial plan. Also, my wife and I are experiencing high stress because of this loss. DWS We don’t Deserve to live our Last Days this Way For months we listened to our broker on the Portuguese Multicultural CIRV radio about 8% interest, risk free syndicated mortgages..so we invested a total of $260.000.00 in 3 separate projects, back in September 2015 when we sold our home in Oakville, and we were ready for early retirement, because my husband had a heart attack and eventually a heart surgery, triple by pass, and we decided to move up north where we own a cottage, and so we thought that the interest alone was enough to live on for a while until we get our principal money back, ...Well not so, after a few months the interest stopped coming, and when I reached out to them the broker and his posy had no answers for us, .. We even went down to Sorrenti Law office in Vaughn a few times because they didn’t answer the phone or respond to emails, to have him tell us that after paying the senior partners, there is no money left to pay us.. this was so devastating news to hear, we never thought this would happen, we feel betrayed and dare to say violated, and robbed of our retirement, got ourselves in debt, hoping to pay back when we received our money, and now it is not going to happen anytime soon... We live with so much stress and failing health issues,.... we don’t deserve to live our last days this way, after contributing a lifetime to taxes and the economy of this country and in the end no one helps us. I hope there is a light at the end of this very dark tunnel. A&JG We Lost all our life Savings We are just average working people. We have tried to do the right thing and have been saving and investing what we could for 25+ years. We have always tried to be cautious and weren't intereted in high risk gains or risky ventures. Then our financial advisor at Erb Financial who we also considered a family friend introduced us to syndicate mortgage investing through several presentations she held for all her clients. At first we did not invest, but with every visit she keep insisting how safe it was and telling us about how much money she and her other clients were making. Each time we reminded her we are not risky investors, we cannot put ourselves in a position where we could lose our principal. Each time she reassured us it was safe, guaranteed 8% interest paid, only highly reputable, completely vetted projects and developers were used, ensuring principals were never at risk. She eventually talked us into trying a short term syndicate term of 1-2 years to ease our concern. Since it was early on, we received our monthly dividends as promised and when the mortgage term ended we received our principal and the promised 8% interest. She then advised us if we were to reinvest in another project the buy in would stay at the lower minimum limit of $25K. So we trusted her and did. Slowly over the next year she convinced us to invest all our savings in longer term syndicate (3-5 yr) mortgage projects ($165K total). After a year or two in these syndicate mortgage projects started to encounter various delays and problems and none ever completed. Each time we raised concerns she told us not to worry our money was safe, Fortress was taking them over and we had nothing to worry about. Well, we have lost all of our entire savings. It is not just the money (though that is devasting in itself), it is the breach of trust, the embarrassment of being victimized and the stress of losing the security of our savings, all to line the pockets of these greedy, unapologetic, unethical and morally bankrupt individuals. Michelle K

Closing Arguments (Apr 1-2, 2025) Day 1 Crown Prosecution's Closing Argument The prosecution began by restating the charges against the defendants, emphasizing the seriousness of the allegations. Originally there were two charges- Fraud and Secret Commissions on four development projects, however the Crown narrowed this to Fraud on two projects: Collier and Sky City . Crown counsel Vallery Bayly highlighted the three elements of fraud. Deceit, Dishonesty & Deprivation. 1. Deceit 2. Dishonesty 3. Deprivation 1. Deceit The prosecution argued that promotional contained falsehoods. Documents used terms like "as is" and described Loan to Value "LTV" based on current value, and called the investment secured without clarifying that the values were opinions, not actual appraisals. Materials shows included a “What is LTV ?” slide stating “proper evaluations are essential” without indicating the basis for the LTV, and a pamphlet explaining appraisals and "why LTV matter s". The appraisal section of the FSCO investor disclosure firm, showed an appraisal of $21 Million, however this was this was the opinion of value, ie the future value. In some documents the "project value" line was left blank, yet the i n the Law Society disclosure form, point #9 indicates “I am satisfied that current value is $21 Million, LTV 85%. The prosecution stressed that investors testified about security and LTV being import to their investments and argued that forms should have been honest. It was not acceptable to tell investors their funds were secure when that was not true. The Crown stated this was not a "buyer beware" situation. 2. Dishonesty The prosecution argued the the failure to disclose actual "as is" appraisals was dishonest . Evidence suggested that Petrozza had an appraisal as of August 16, 2013, and anther $11 million appraisal, both not provided to investors. Emails discussed a July 24, 2012 appraisal of $6.9 million, demonstrating that Rathore and Petrozza knew real estate appraisals were much lower than the figures presented publicly. The prosecution anticipated the defence would argue that appraisals had to be kept confidential, however a contractual confidential clause does not negate fraud, and it was not on the investors to request appraisals. 3. Deprivation The prosecution cited the Theroux fraud case, noting that a dishonest act resulting in deprivation alone suffices conviction- even if the defendants honestly believed in the completion of projects. Prosecution emphasized evidence showing: Rathore and Petrozza were investors were told and not told - they provided training and were personally involved in the marketing materials Training videos and emails demonstrated knowledge of disclosure omissions . In an email chain between Rathore & Petrozza July 4-6 2012- Petrozza asked for an appraisal to Jeff Cheung - Subject line is Appraisal. They discuss the $6.9 appraisal. Petrozza knows $6.9 million figure will be a problem and not sufficient. They discuss the Felice evaluation and say “Felice for the win!” Other evidence from the Sky City documents, and similar email chains. Email between Petrozza and another Fortress employee - Fortress employee Mr Cercosta states “ I don’t even know why we paid or wasted time “ … Petrozza replies “I said get me an appraisal or evaluation of $9.4 million or better! “ Cercosta replies “It’s an insulting joke”, Petrozza replies “ Agreed, but we get what we need to get to the end goal”. Evaluators confirmed they did not intend their opinions of value to be shared with mom and pop investors. The Crown concluded that the defendants knowingly marketed the investments as secure when they were not, and this dishonesty caused deprivation to the investors. Defence's Closing Argument Scott Fenton began by noting the RCMP lengthy investigation and explaining that the Crown narrowed the charged to two projects. Fenton argued that: Fortress had over 80 projects, and many were successful . (Note that this statement was not supported by evidence. To review a Fortress project analysis, please refer here. Out of the 80 projects, 18 exited with no payout at all to investors (total loss of over $240 Million; 28 projects exited with partial payouts to investors with losses of $180 Million. The total amount of investor funds never repaid to date is over $400 Million. During his arguments, he only listed a handful which were successful. ) Brokers had a legal duty under the act to ensure their clients understood risks and the opinions of value, and this responsibility did not lie with Rathore & Petrozza. (Note: Petrozza was actually a licensed broker with Centro/BDMC while also a controlling principal of Fortress and had a duty of care to the investors). Fortress was developer facing, while Centro/BDMC were investor facing The Defence stressed that: Investors could have asked questions or reviews materials more carefully. In the case of Collier, that the initial developer Mady went bankrupt and that is the “Elephant in the room” (Fact Check-Collier was initially developed by Mady Development Corp; Mady filed for creditor protection January 30 2015; In November 2015 Fortress purchased the Collier Centre and as lead developer they were responsible to repay the SML investors. Fortress later defaulted on its first loan to Morisson. Morrison then listed the property for sale in 2018; in 2019 the property was sold however there were no recoveries to repay the SML investors. Brokers were responsible for explaining terms and conditions to SML investors. Independant Legal Advice (ILA) was provided to investors. (Fact Check: the ILA was arranged and paid for by Fortress) All documents were conveyed to investors via brokerages. The documents that Rathore & Petrozza showed the importance of brokers to disclose information to investors. At one point, the judged asked: “Were the fees payable whether the project was successful or not? If they were not profitable and not completed do they have to pay the money back?” and the t he defence replied “ Well investors could have asked” . The judge responded” I’m asking you .” He added: “ It was calculated assuming it will be profitable?” Defence responded “ It’s not a fee based on profitability” and added” Anyone was free to ask” (Note that the courtroom erupted in laughter from the viewers.) The defence continued to emphasize risk disclosure and argued that the evidence did not support a finding of fraud. Day 2 Defence Closing Arguments Defence Gerald Chan reiterated that: Opinions of value were fully disclosed to investors Opinions of value were independent Fortress was not required to disclose the other valuations/ appraisals in its possession -and in fact was prohibited from doing so Crown's cases are distinguishable (ie. this case differs from a precedent case, and therefore, the precedent's legal reasoning or holding does not apply to the this case due to materially different facts.) The Defence argued that: Fortress was not investor-facing, and disclosures to investors were made by brokers and lawyers. Brokers dealt with the investors, and had the duty to disclose to investors per regulations- however that regulation was not applicable to Fortress. The Judge responded: “Brokers don’t immunize Fortress from responsibility” . The judge cannot rely on common market judgement about valuation methods. Different valuation methodologies exist, and the evidence did not conclusively show misuse. In exchange with the judge about valuation methodology the defence argued that anticipated future value could legitimately affect valuations and that property valuation is a "murky area". The defence also stated that email chains did not demonstrate undue interference in valuation information and that working with developers and using independent assessments was lawful. The closing argument ended with the defence maintaining that the case did cannot be deemed as fraud.

Class Action Law Suits Lawyers Mitchell Wine, of MSTW Professional Corporation and Margaret Waddell of Sotos joined forces in prosecuting five proposed class actions relating to syndicated mortgage loans (SMLs) promoted by Fortress Real Developments Inc. and Fortress Real Capital Inc. Details of the proposed class actions, as well as statements of claims, and settlements can be found on the Sotos website. (search Fortress). The actions relate to the SMLs registered on five different real estate developments: Collier Centre – (2012 syndicated mortgage loan only) Progress Manors Ten88 Sutton/The Link Harmony Village Lake Simcoe/The Kemp Orchard Calgary – only in respect of the charge registered as Registration No. 141 112 373. CURRENT PROPOSED CLASS ACTIONS PARTIAL SETTLEMENTS There have been 5 partial settlements thus far. Please refer to the Sotos website, (search under cases/Fortress) or the FAAN website for details https://www.faanmortgageadmin.com/fortress/english . Sutton/The Link Settlement BDMC and Ildina Galati Estate FFM, Rosalia Spadafora, and Saul Perlov FMP, Tonino Amandola, Michael Daramola, and Graham McWaters Derek Sorrenti, Grant Morgan, and Sorrenti Law Professional Corporation It is important to understand that a class action certification hearing the initial procedural step where a judge will determine if a lawsuit can proceed as a class action law suit. The judge will not decide the merits of the case, but will decide if the claim has a valid cause of action, a defined class, common issues, a suitable representative, and is the preferred method for resolution. UPCOMING CERTIFICATION HEARING FEB 24-26, 2026 Outstanding claims against Fortress Real Developments and the Appraisers (for Progress Manors/Ten 88 & Harmony Village Lake Simcoe/the Kemp only) will be pursued in an upcoming class action certification hearing from Feb 24-26, 2026. To attend the hearing via zoom, please register here: When : Feb 24, 2026 10:00 AM Eastern Time (US and Canada) Topic: MCDOWELL v. FORTRESS REAL CAPITAL INC. et al | CV-16-00560268-00CP Register in advance for this webinar: https://ca01web.zoom.us/webinar/register/WN_rjWIh5YRQKa45NGD4QFKVA How can I get my money back? Many investors have asked us how they can get their money back. We have carefully looked at various avenues for recovery. Other Class Action Pursuits An investigation team comprised of a lawyer, researcher and a forensic accountant had worked diligently with the help of Rose Ray , to create a report that would be used to highlight potential law suits pertaining to Fortress. A potential Class action lawsuit against Lamb Development Corp was filed, however unfortunately the law firm Groia advised they were unable to pursue the lawsuit further. Archived communications regarding this endeavour can be found here . Another law firm, Kallochlian Myers LLP filed a Statement of Claim in 2020 against Olympia Trust Company for the registered funds investors. However, on June 19, 2023, the Court of Appeal for Ontario has dismissed the appeal of the order dismissing the motion for certification. A copy of the decision is available here . If you are an investor who has approached a law firm regarding a class action law suit against other Fortress related parties not mentioned on our website, please let us know. Q & A Current Proposed Class Action Law Suits & Settlements 1. Why wasn't my project / developer chosen for the class action law suit headed by Mitchell Wine and Sotos? This would likely be due to the fact that the lead plaintiffs invested in the particular projects listed above. 2. Why does it take so long to recover the funds for a class action law suit? We understand this is the question most victims ask. Unfortunately, recovering money through a class action lawsuit is not quick or simple. • Class actions take years to move through the courts. • Defendants often fight every step, which adds delays. • Even if successful, legal costs and fees are deducted before any money is shared. Class actions can hold wrongdoers accountable and sometimes lead to financial settlements, but they are a long, uncertain process with no guarantee of full recovery. 3. I didn't receive my class action law suit settlement payment. Who do I contact? Please contact the Claims Administrator - FAAN Mortgages . They can be reached at 1 (833) 495-3338 or by email at info@faanmortgageadmin.com.

We are in this Together. Help by Contributing. VOSMI is completely administered on a volunteer basis, with the goal to inform the Fortress investors of the latest developments in possible class action law suits, to clarify questions related to project status, and also simply to help investors understand how this fiasco happened to them. The costs related to VOSMI are two-fold. First, there are costs associated with running the website and email newsletters (via Wix platform). This cost is approximately $700 per year. The second cost is the research that has been undertaken with regards to Class Action Law suits. In order to launch a Class Action Law suit, an intense amount of research is required to review whether a law suit is viable. In 2019, an anonymous investor contributed $50,000 in 2019 in order to start the work. A further contribution of $10,000 was paid by investor Rose Ray to help cover legal and other costs. The work of the investigative team led by Darryl Levitt and his team , was instrumental in the recent class action law suit launched by Groia & Company law firm against Brad Lamb. Unfortunately, Groia & Company decided to not to pursue the law suit against Brad Lamb as they did not feel it was viable. On the other hand, the report created by the investigative team has also been shared with lawyers Mitchell Wine and Margaret Waddell who have current class action law suits in the works . We are asking the investors (and also any referral agents or brokers) to help compensate for our costs by contributing $25 or whichever amount you can afford. Simply click the button below, and you can either make the contribution with your credit card via Paypal, or an e-transfer via your own online banking to info@vosmi.ca . We appreciate your support. After all, we are all in this together. Contribute

The Developers who partnered with Fortress Over 25 real estate developers partnered with Fortress Developments. Lamb Development Corp partnered with Fortress on 14 real estate projects. Lamb failed to repay over $47 Million to the Syndicate Mortgage investors. Developer Pie Chart

Fortress in the News 2025 Developers found guilty of defrauding investors out of retirement savings in Barrie, Winnipeg May 28, 2025- CBC Fortress Real Developments co-founders found guilty of fraud May 28-Globe & Mail Syndicated mortgage firm co-founders found guilty of massive fraud May 30-2025 CMP 2022 Fortress Real Developments founders charged with fraud in connection with syndicated mortgage probe June 22, 2022 - Financial Post Fortress Founders Charged with Fraud June 22, 2022- Toronto Star Fortress founders charged in mortgage investments scheme June 22, 2022 - Orillia Matters Ottawa senior says he lost life savings investing with company now facing fraud charges July 6, 2022 - CTV News 2021 Former executive of troubled developer Fortress involved in new real estate company September 13, 2021 2020 FSRA Imposes administrative Penalty of $250,000 on Fortress Real Development Inc. September 19, 2020 Planned web series to shine light on alleged Fortress Real scam December 29, 2020- Canadian Real Estate Magazine 2019 Victims cry foul over Fortress Real rewards June 13, 2019 Mortgage Broker News No retirement for 73 year old investor June 11, 2019 Mortgage Broker News 'I still feel ashamed'; investors' life savings held in limbo Jan. 11, 2019 Barrie Today 2018 Lenders to seize 13 real estate projects Oct 25, 2018 Globe and Mail RCMP raid 6 locations in GTA as part of syndicated mortgage fraud Apr. 13, 2018 CBC.ca Canadian police search Fortress office in mortgage fraud probe: sources Apr. 3, 2018 Reuters Trustee to take over Fortress broker in wake of RCMP raid Apr. 20, 2018 The Globe and Mail Fortress investors could face 'significant losses' Jun. 24, 2018 The Globe and Mail Allegations of inflated property values at centre of RCMP syndicated mortgage fraud investigation Jul. 19, 2018 CBC.ca Fortress misled investors about land valuation, RCMP alleges Oct. 21, 2018 The Globe and Mail RCMP allege obstruction in Fortress fraud investigation Oct. 23, 2018 CBC.ca Inside the fall of Fortress Dec. 14, 2018 The Globe and Mail 2017 How a real estate developer's efforts to silence a critic failed Jan. 19, 2017 MacLean's 2016 The high-risk world of syndicated mortgages Apr 29, 2016 The Star Just how safe is the ‘safe’ world of syndicated mortgages? April 4, 2016, MacLean's

Trial Summary These are not official court transcripts. They are observations and summaries of the prosecution & defence questioning and witness testimony. Opening Statements Prosecution Opening Remarks The Prosecution alleges that: Rathore and Petrozza deceived the public by misrepresenting the true land value of the projects in which they were investing  They obtained opinions of value and represented them as actual appraisals to brokers and investors, even though the property value was substantially less than the stated opinion of value Rathore and Petrozza kept a large portion of the investors’ money for themselves, and this was not disclosed to investors Defence Opening Remarks Advance payments to Fortress were disclosed to the public Opinions of value were provided to investors Rathore & Petrozza did not act alone, they had office staff assisting them Fortress retained law firms ( Norton Rose; Gowlings) for tax opinions Fortress used a reputable custodian Olympia Trust, to hold the investors’ funds Many development projects were successful A failed project is not an indicator of fraud Clients are plead not guilty of fraud and secret commissions and the defence seeks acquittal of all charges. Week 1 (Oct 28 -Nov 2024) Witness #1 Investor #1 Prosecution Questioning The first witness was a retired female who put $50,000 in cash in the Collier project with her husband, and $70,000 registered funds into Harmony Village Sheppard. She previously worked in IT and part-time as a real estate agent. She attended a Fortress presentation in Barrie where both Rathore and Petrozza spoke. Materials presented described the investments as: low risk 8% interest loan to value (LTV) 2-year term principal secured by land a statement reading: "The investors get their money back before developers get theirs ". She received interest payments for Collier until January 2015, after which she was notified the project entered receivership. She stopped receiving interest and did not receive her principal back. Harmony Village went into receivership and the investors received 70% repayment once the land was sold. The Prosecution showed the witness an email exchange regarding an Opinion of Value. The email was from Cushman & Wakefield, where they were advising Fortress that it was understood by both parties that the evaluation they were proving for the Collier project was not a formal value. The witness commented that at the presentation she attended, the figure that was provided was referred to as an "appraisal", not Opinion of Value. The Prosecution went through the SML loan documentation and the witness admitted she did not pay attention to details. The prosecution also pointed out a page in the documentation that referred to an “appraisal” of the property, and in another paragraph referring to the “as is” value at $21 million. (Note that "as is" value of a property should be the actual value of the property or of the land- it is not a "built out" value. ) The Prosecution asked if she understood what this meant, to which she replied “just the land”. She also believed the LTV was 85%. They then went through an appraisal report dated June 2012. This is a month or so prior to Cushman Wakefield Opinion of Value. The land value was a mere $7.5 million. The witness was unaware this appraisal existed. The Prosecution went through the Fee Disclosure overview, a document that listed how the money (SML) was being used. legal fee (paid by borrower), mortgage brokerage fee (Centro/BDMC). It listed lawyers, Centro, and brokers. Fortress was not listed. Defence Questioning The Defence emphasized the witness did not read the documents carefully. Now keep in mind, all the presentations and flyers she has seen about Fortress SMLs promoted the SML investment as being low risk, name on title, 8% annual interest etc. The defence asked if her understanding was that the SML was safe? The witness said yes, based on the appraisal value she was given. The defence asked if it was the broker who made her feel at ease? The witness said yes, but it was because of appraisal value making the investment feel safe. The Defence reviewed the FSCO (financial regulator’s form.) The form stated that “brokers, agents or related parties may receive a percentage of profits and may be paid in advance of project completion.” The Defence asked “you don’t recall asking how much Fortress would get paid? ” She replied no. Witness # 2 Principal Broker FDS Prosecution Questioning The FDS Principal Broker testified he oversaw compliance at FDS, broker, training, and documentation review. As Fortress COO, Petrozza provided the brokerages (FDS, FMP, FFM) with the SML documents and compliance videos; Rathore handled the project/development aspects. A Sky City webinar was played where Rathore discussed project highlight, and Petrozza discussed SML terms, and reviewed the project fact sheet which included LTV of 85% and 8% interest. He stated the $18 million evaluation was provided by Global Legacy, and a face value up to $35 million. He mentioned risks ( non-liquid investment, locked in funds). He added that the investment is "secured against the land". He advised brokers met to "scare investors" but to explain disclosures and risks. An August 2013 email revealed a Sky City appraisal of $5.9 million that was not shared with investors and brokers. The witness said if he had known this, it would have been a huge red flag and would have made the investment RRSP non-eligible. The Prosecution went back to the appraisal emails, where the author states the residual value would be $11 million ( based on hypothetical conditions and extraordinary assumptions) to which Petrozza’s email reply to the other Fortress staff is that the appraisal is a "joke of an appraisal", and to "focus on the end goal" Defence Questioning The witness also discussed a regulatory correspondence (FSCO) between the witness, Rathore, Petrozza, Ildina Galati (former principal broker of Centro/BDMC), and other staff. FSCO was seeking to clarify how Fortress and the brokerages were being paid, and the witness suggested to the group that he make a presentation to FSCO. Petrozza responded that the witness should not volunteer to do a presentation. The witness responded to Petrozza that he wanted the regulator to understand what they are doing and that it was" crystal clear". The witness stated to the prosecution that it was the role of Centro/BDMC to obtain and verify the appraisals. (Note that Petrozza was a licensed broker for Centro; while also being COO of Fortress). The appraisals and evaluations were then provided by Centro to the brokerages. The witness was also asked whether he was aware how Rathore & Petrozza were getting paid - the witness responded that he understood they were paid a portion of profits, upon project completion. He said that if Rathore and Petrozza were taking a percentage of the SML funds and paying themselves, it should have been disclosed to investors. The witness advised that all templates and documentation they received describing the KTV, SML advantages, project fact sheets, evaluations, was provided to them by Centro (BDMC) and Fortress. Witness # 3 Investor #2 Prosecution Questioning Another female investor testified she invested $80,000 in Collier and other Fortress projects with her retirement savings. She felt assured that the SML investments were safe and fully secured against the land, based on the information presented to her by Fortress, Centro, and the broker. The Defence highlighted fine print indicating Fortress would be paid before completion and with profits. She acknowledged signing but said this was not made clear to her. The defence stressed that brokers had a duty to explain risks. Witness # 4 FDS President An FDS employee testified that he understood Fortress received 50/50 commission with the developers. When asked what cars Rathore and Petrozza drive, he recalled several luxury vehicles ( Aston Martin, a Ferrari California, a Porsche Panerama, and a Porsche GT3.). Note that the Defence objected, however the judge allowed the question. The Prosecution showed the witness an appraisal. This was the first time he saw it, and confirmed investors were not given it. The evaluation provided to investors was overstated ( $21m vs. actual $7.5m) The defence maintained Fortress SMLs were high risk investments, commissions and risks fully disclosed and signed by investors; all investors were given independent legal advice. Witness # 5 Cushman & Wakefield SVP-Opinion of Value A senior VP at Cushman & Wakefield testified the Opinion of Value provided to Fortress in 2012 was for internal use only, not intended to be an appraisal or shared with the public. He was approached in 2012 by Petrozza, who is his cousin, for an Opinion of Value for the Collier project. Once he leaned it was used publicly, and in brochures, he cut ties with Fortress. The Defence asked the witness if his letter to Fortress indicated that it was to be used for internal purposes only, and the witness replied that the investors, as he understood, were the purchasers of the land. He maintained that he did not intend for the Opinion of Value to be shared with the general public. Week 2 (Nov 4- 5, 2024 Witness # 6 Investor #3 A woman who invested in Sky City and several other projects testified Fortress presentations and documentation led her to believe the SML investments were low risk. The investor met both Rathore and Petrozza. Initially, a couple of the projects paid off. She referred other people to invest as well, however they no longer speak to her. The defence focussed again on signed disclosures, which she stated she did not clearly understand, even calling herself "stupid for failing to comprehend them. Witness # 7 Global Legacy Managing Partner -Opinions of Value A managing partner of Global Legacy testified he is not accredited to provide appraisals, however he does have an MBA. He did not know that "mom & pop” investors would receive his opinions of value. The opinions of value were all based on the information that Fortress supplied to Global Legacy. He expected his opinions of value would be used internally, not shared with the investors. The Defence went into a lengthy presentation that focused on how the Opinion of Value increased over the years and was looking to justify how their Opinions of Value increased. The defence ignored addressing appraisals. Witness # 8 Investor #4 A male investor with $900,000 across 8 projects testified he attended presentations, spoke with the principals over the phone, believed his name would be on title and his investment was secure. Specifically, the security of the investment was the loan to value ratio, and that he would be on the deed of the property. He did not feel his SML investments were risky. He understood that the Opinion of Value and appraisal meant the same thing, and thought his money was being used for the purchase of the land and soft costs as per Petrozza and Rathore. During cross-examination the defence went through documents that he signed. The witness made it clear that he never had documents to review before signing. He understood that Fortress oversaw all facets of every project with the developers. The defence again focused on the risks of investing in syndicated mortgages. The witness explained he attended the defendant’s office a few times and talked to Rathore about any potential risks; he was made to feel that Colliers was a safe investment. Witness # 9 Investor #5 A Mandarin-speaking investor and his wife invested in the Collier project. He first saw an ad in a Chinese newspaper, and later attended a presentation at a Cineplex theatre with 100-200 people in attendance. Rathore and Petrozza were both there, and Rathore spoke to the audience about the success of other projects. The witness thought his money was being used for the project.The witness recalled having a lawyer explain the documents via video, but he and his wife felt the lawyer who spoke to them did not represent them because they didn’t pay a fee for his advice. They were mainly focused on the interest rate on his investment and that their name would be on the land title. He admitted he and his wife went through the documents very quickly with little to no time for review. They felt the risk was very low based on what was presented in the theatre regarding successful Fortress projects. They did not see the risk document and their broker did not explain it. The term “risk” never came up. It was never explained by anyone and their 3rd ranking mortgage was not understood. Upon signing the documents, the witness was never told how much Fortress would get paid. Week 3 (Nov 12-14, 2024) Witness #10 FSCO Employee A former Sr Compliance Officer with FSRA. (formerly FSCO) testified his review of Centro's compliance in 2013 did not extend to investor files. He reviewed only hour institutional lender files-no mom and pop SML investor files. He explained that his examination was to ensure Centro was in compliance with the MBLA. His scope was to review the brokerage policies & procedures, not to audit the brokerage. During this examination he met with the principal broker, Ildina Galati. (who is now deceased). The Prosecutor also went over a letter dated April 2013. This letter provided a summary of findings. Galati responded in the letter that Centro/Fortress will establish separate brokerages. (these brokerages became FMP, FFM & FDS). The Defence went over the role of the FSRA employee, and how the brokerage's role was to take reasonable steps to disclose material risks; and to give each lender the proper lender forms in a language that can be understood by the lender. The Defence stated that certain requirements and provisions only came into effect much later after his Centro review. The Defence also clarified that the witness's examination of Centro was not as a result of a complaint, it was a regular compliance review. The witness stated that the existence of policies and procedures was the main purpose of the exam. Witness #11 Former Fortress Employee-EVP Strategy & Development A former Fortress EVP testified his role was to bring in developer clients, underwrite projects, and secure financial institution backing. He said FI's do not rely on opinions of value and was unaware of how much Rathore and Petrozza were paid from SML proceeds. He confirmed the Sky City land was a parking lot in 2013 when he joined Fortress, and remained a parking lot when he left Fortress in 2017. Emails showed internal pressure to obtain higher appraisals to meet investor expectations. The Prosecutor then went over an email trail between the witness, another Fortress employee and Vince Petrozza with regards to appraisals and construction financing. The appraisal provided by one company is listed as $5.9 million. They discuss how they should look at residual value. In another email Petrozza responds to the other Fortress employee, and removes the witness from the email trail and says"Get me an appraisal of $9.5 Million or better!" Upon cross-examination, the Defence went over an offering memorandum. (Note that an offering memorandum is provided to accredited investors in the exempt market.) The Defence went over this document with the witness, and read the risks that were cited. The witness clarified that this was a security offering and that he was not involved in that side of the business. They went over the different types of exits for projects. 1. Completion- project is built, units complete, proceed to pay back SMIs. 2. Refinance 3. Sale- entire project is sold and cash is paid to SMIs. The Defence asked if the witness was involved in the execution or steps made to pay the SMIs? Who was responsible? The witness responded that he believed it was a combination of Fortress, BDMC, and the Fortress affiliated brokers. Witness # 12 Mady Development Executive Mady was the developer who partnered with Fortress for the Collier project in 2012. Mady sought bankruptcy protection in January 2015. Fortress then took the project over from Mady in 2015. The witness was asked whether they were made aware of the commission that Fortress was taking from the investors' principal and the witness confirmed they were aware. Even though they did not receive the full principal they felt the project would still succeed with the condo sales. Week 4 - Jan 27, 2025 Witness # 12 RCMP Forensic Accountant An RCMP forensic accountant described detailed financial analysis of Fortress (eg Sky City, Collier) tracing investor funds, fee distributions, and who benefited financially. The Defence asked the witness if he knew that the offering memorandum was provided to investors? The witness replied he did not. (note that the OMs were only provided to accredited investors, not to the mom & pop investors).

Please wait a moment for the form to load...

Exploring a Class Action Law Suit for Fortress Investors Investigative Team & Updates the research of Class Action Law Suits A great deal of research was undertaken with regards to class action law suits for the Fortress syn dicated mortgage investors. The Investigative Team was comprised of the following professionals: • Darryl Levitt (lawyer; Darryl Levitt Law ) • Dave Oswald (forensic accountant, Forensic Restitution ) • Bruce Livesey (private investigator; i20 Research Inc .) Rose Ray, a broker, worked tirelessly with this team in its effort to pursue a class action law suit that would benefit the victims. Here are the updates we were provided by Rose and the team. Although it is unfortunate that a class action law suit did not come to fruition, we thank Rose and the team for their incredible efforts and countless of hours in their work to try to bring justice to the syndicated mortgage victims. Updates from Rose Ray (2019-2022) Video dated Nov 29, 2019 An anonymous investor has contributed $50,000 to help fund this investigation to help bring the research to the next level. Our ask is for the Fortress investors to contribute $100 (or an amount they can afford) to help reimburse the investor's generous contribution. Click here to view video. Click here to read Darryl Levitt's letter to investors. Note: Contribution form has since been updated - see April 22, 2021 update. Video dated Feb 3, 2020. Click here to view video. Summary: Reminder to investors to save their documents pertaining to their investments in case the team requires the files. Promissory note holders to contact Rose as well as they will be addressed separately from SML investors; as well as investors who were "transferred" from one project to another knowingly or unknowingly. Promotional materials, recordings of events would be appreciated as well for the projects listed in the above paragraph. Video dated March 11, 2020. Click here to view video. Investigative work is ongoing. Rose requesting investors to write to FAAN (details in video.) (Note: This ask is no longer required) Video dated April l, 2020. Click here to view video. Summary: Key Parties identified; Fortress, Project owners/corporations/key personnel; Auditors, Trustees, Developers, Appraisers & evaluators, agents, brokers & law firms.1st two projects of interest to pursue initially: Sky City & Colliers. I nvestigative reports have been compiled; Investigative Team is in discussion with law firms and litigation funders. Video dated May 17, 2020. Click here to view video. Summary: Update from Rose on Funding. Approximately $14,000 has been contributed from investors to date. Videos dated April 12, 2021 Video regarding law firm Groia & Company. Click here to watch the video & here to read the statement of claim regarding BRAD J. LAMB REALTY INC., BRAD J. LAMB, and LAMB DEV. Please ensure you read the statement of claim to see whether your project is included. Video regarding lawyers Mitchell Wine & Margaret Waddell. Click here to watch the video. Please refer to this page for further information on the class action law suits & statements of claim regarding the following projects: The Orchard, Progress Manors (Ten 88); Sutton; Colliers; Harmony Simcoe. April 22, 2021 There has been a lot of excitement regarding the mew class action law suit announcements pertaining to the law suits led by Groia & Company law firm and the Mitchell Wine & Margaret Waddell team. The investigative team lead by Darryl Levitt has been working very diligently to help us. June 6, 2022 Update from Rose Ray regarding Brad Lamb Class Action Law Suit. "I wanted to bring everyone up to speed on the status of the class action we have been working on for the past 2yrs. As you know, a law firm by the name of Groia had filed a Statement of Claim about a year ago for a class action lawsuit against Brad Lamb. Unfortunately Groia was not able to continue with the law suit as they could not find funders to commit to funding the law suit. As soon as we were informed of this news, Corinne and I communicated with another law firm in the hopes they would take on the law suit. Unfortunately after carefully reviewing the files and information, they declined as well. At this point, neither can pursue this lawsuit. ALL lawyers agree that fraud has taken place, no one disputes that. The issue is Legally do they have enough evidence that proves Brad Lamb KNEW that investors were mislead and what is his direct liability, unfortunately the opinion is that we don’t have enough evidence. Even though we have provided hundreds of documents, videos etc.. there is not enough certainty that our case will win. This means the risk and the cost are just too high for a funder and for a law firm to take on. Remember if a law firm loses, they have to pay all the costs of the other law firm, and we are talking about millions of dollars for this type of case. This is not the news we wanted to deliver to you. We have invested countless hours pursuing a way to get funds back to investors. However, we have exhausted all avenues for a class action lawsuit. Thank you to all that were willing to assist by providing files etc. The investor who provided the initial funds for all the work that was done, is still out an additional $18,100. To all those who contributed to reimbursing – THANK YOU. It is unfortunate that more investors did not contribute, since this investor took a huge risk to try and find justice for all of us, it would be a nominal amount if all contributed. The news we have received is an additional blow for sure to this investor. If any of you have not contributed , and would be willing to help alleviate the financial burden for this investor, you may send an e-transfer to info@vosmi.ca . Any amount would be appreciated. ($20-$100). Other payment arrangements are accepted such as a cheque or PayPal ."

These are basic questions & answers for investors and the public regarding the VOSMI. FAQ What is VOSMI? Victims of Syndicated Mortgage Investments. What are Syndicated Mortgages? A Syndicated Mortgage is a group of individuals who lend money privately to a borrower to finance real estate developments, such as residential condo buildings. I am an investor of Fortress Real Development SMIs. What can I do? Join our group so that you can stay updated on projects group discussions. You will be required to fill out a questionnaire prior to your admission to the group. Once we have confirmed that you are an investor, you will be able to sign into the member portal. Can I join your group if I did not invest with Fortress RDI? Our group is dedicated to individuals who invested in Fortress Real Development Investments. You can follow us on twitter & keep checking our main website for new updates & VOSMI stories.

May 13, 2020 Update Please watch the video below from Rose Ray. To date we have received a total of $14,000 in contributions to help fund the investigation of our potential class action law suit. Those funds will be advanced by the admins of VOSMI to the investor who fronted the $50,000. If you have not yet contributed $100 towards this endeavor, please complete this form . You may pay via credit card or an transfer . Instructions included in the link provided .